Two methods of natural family planning

I read with interest the recent article by Wade and associates, "A randomized prospective study of the use-effectiveness of 2 methods of natural family planning: an interim report" (134: 628, 1979). In reference to the study of the ovulation method, the authors noted that abstinence begins on the 1st day of mucus secretion and continues until the evening of the 4th day beyond the peak or maximal mucus secretion. In the ovulation method, the peak symptom is not the same as maximal mucus secretion as was indicated in the paper. The peak symptom is defined as the last day of the mucus discharge that is clear and/or stretchy and/or lubricative. In the definition of peak symptom, the amount of mucus discharge is not specifically important and may often be misleading. I had the opportunity to do a site visit at this study at the request of the National Institutes of Health while the study was in progress. I analyzed several pregnancies which occurred in users of this ovulation method. Some of the pregnancies occurred as the result of poor teaching of the concept of peak symptom. In the ovulation method, proper understanding and teaching of that concept are essential to the measurement of its effectiveness. Noticeably missing from this interim report was any discussion of the quality control procedures which were utilized to guarantee a high-quality educational service to the people entered into the study. While the authors claim that the methods were taught by professional teachers, these teachers were actually women who had previously used the method and/or had formalized training in teaching the method. Simple use of either of the methods certainly does not qualify an individual to teach natural family planning. For those with formalized teaching, such training should have been outlined since judgment on the effectiveness of the teaching cannot be made; such a judgment is essential to the proper analysis of results. Finally, while the study claims to be a use-effectiveness study, it is rather a modified version of extended use-effectiveness. No objective definition of "user failure" is provided. One cannot ascertain how many pregnancies were related to poor teaching, nor can one tell how many occurred as the result of the couples' last minute exercise of their freedom to use their fertility. The use-effectiveness of the 2 methods under study as a means to achieve a pregnancy have been ignored. In doing so, the investigators have ignored use-effectiveness reality.