Although several studies have assessed the risk of venous thromboembolism with newer hormonal contraception, few have examined thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, and results have been conflicting.
Methods
In this 15-year Danish historical cohort study, we followed nonpregnant women, 15 to 49 years old, with no history of cardiovascular disease or cancer. Data on use of hormonal contraception, clinical end points, and potential confounders were obtained from four national registries.
Results
A total of 1,626,158 women contributed 14,251,063 person-years of observation, during which 3311 thrombotic strokes (21.4 per 100,000 person-years) and 1725 myocardial infarctions (10.1 per 100,000 person-years) occurred. As compared with nonuse, current use of oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg was associated with the following relative risks (and 95% confidence intervals) for thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction, according to progestin type: norethindrone, 2.2 (1.5 to 3.2) and 2.3 (1.3 to 3.9); levonorgestrel, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.0) and 2.0 (1.6 to 2.5); norgestimate, 1.5 (1.2 to 1.9) and 1.3 (0.9 to 1.9); desogestrel, 2.2 (1.8 to 2.7) and 2.1 (1.5 to 2.8); gestodene, 1.8 (1.6 to 2.0) and 1.9 (1.6 to 2.3); and drospirenone, 1.6 (1.2 to 2.2) and 1.7 (1.0 to 2.6), respectively. With ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 20 μg, the corresponding relative risks according to progestin type were as follows: desogestrel, 1.5 (1.3 to 1.9) and 1.6 (1.1 to 2.1); gestodene, 1.7 (1.4 to 2.1) and 1.2 (0.8 to 1.9); and drospirenone, 0.9 (0.2 to 3.5) and 0.0. For transdermal patches, the corresponding relative risks were 3.2 (0.8 to 12.6) and 0.0, and for a vaginal ring, 2.5 (1.4 to 4.4) and 2.1 (0.7 to 6.5).
Conclusions
Although the absolute risks of thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction associated with the use of hormonal contraception were low, the risk was increased by a factor of 0.9 to 1.7 with oral contraceptives that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 20 μg and by a factor of 1.3 to 2.3 with those that included ethinyl estradiol at a dose of 30 to 40 μg, with relatively small differences in risk according to progestin type. (Funded by the Danish Heart Association.).
birth control pill heart attack risk, oral contraceptive stroke risk, hormonal contraception cardiovascular events, ethinyl estradiol thrombotic stroke, combined oral contraceptive myocardial infarction, birth control cardiovascular side effects, contraceptive pill heart disease, hormonal birth control stroke study, oral contraceptive thrombosis risk, progestin type cardiovascular risk, levonorgestrel stroke risk
Cite this article
Lidegaard Ø, Løkkegaard, E., Jensen, A., Skovlund, C. W., & Keiding, N. (2012). Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception. *The New England journal of medicine*, *366*(24), 2257-2266. https://doi.org/10.1056/NEJMoa1111840
Lidegaard Ø, Løkkegaard E, Jensen A, Skovlund CW, Keiding N. Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception. N Engl J Med. 2012;366(24):2257-2266. doi:10.1056/NEJMoa1111840
Lidegaard Ø, et al. "Thrombotic stroke and myocardial infarction with hormonal contraception." *The New England journal of medicine*, vol. 366, no. 24, 2012, pp. 2257-2266.
Mørch LS et al., 2017The New England Journal of Medicine
BACKGROUND: Little is known about whether contemporary hormonal contraception is associated with an increased risk of breast cancer.
METHODS: We assessed associations between the use of hormonal con...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionContraception/Comparison > FABM vs Hormonal > Side Effects
Hennekens CH et al., 1977The New England Journal of Medicine
A series of semi-structured qualitative interviews were undertaken with civil society stakeholders as part of this project. This project explored the role of trust and transparency within the context ...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionContraception/Comparison > FABM vs Hormonal > Side Effects
BackgroundCombined hormonal contraceptives (CHCs) place women at increased risk of venous thromboembolic events (VTEs) and arterial thrombotic events (ATEs), including acute myocardial infarction and ...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionContraception/Comparison > FABM vs Hormonal > Side Effects
Yonis H et al., 2025
Open Access
BMJ (Clinical Research Ed.)
Objective: To evaluate the association between contemporary hormonal contraceptive use and the risk of incident ischaemic stroke and myocardial infarction.
Design: Real-world, nationwide, prospective ...
Contraception/Comparison > Side Effects > Hormonal ContraceptionContraception/Comparison > FABM vs Hormonal > Side EffectsGeneral OB/GYN > Epidemiology > Prevalence