Two sets of focus group discussions on the advantages and disadvantages of the rhythm method were carried out in the Philippines in 1980 and 1981. The first discussions were held among 30 women and nine men 21-40 years of age, and the second among eight women 25-35 years of age who had voluntary pregnancy terminations after the method had failed. Among the perceived advantages of rhythm were that it permits spontaneous intercourse on the safe days and has no bad side effects. Among the perceived disadvantages were that it is ineffective, especially for women with irregular periods, and it requires abstinence. The women who had had voluntary pregnancy terminations discussed their motivations and rationales and the methods that they had used. The information obtained from the discussions formed the basis for support materials that are now used throughout the country.
rhythm method user attitudes, calendar method effectiveness perceptions, natural family planning barriers, fabm user satisfaction, rhythm method failure experiences, periodic abstinence acceptance, natural family planning cultural attitudes, fertility awareness method disadvantages, family planning focus groups, nfp user perspectives philippines
Cite this article
Verzosa, C. C., Llamas, N., & Mahoney, R. T. (1984). Attitudes toward the rhythm method in the Philippines. *Studies in family planning*, *15*(2), 74-78.
Verzosa CC, Llamas N, Mahoney RT. Attitudes toward the rhythm method in the Philippines. Stud Fam Plann. 1984;15(2):74-78.
Verzosa, Cecilia C., et al. "Attitudes toward the rhythm method in the Philippines." *Studies in family planning*, vol. 15, no. 2, 1984, pp. 74-78.
Fehring RJ et al., 2013MCN. The American Journal of Maternal Child Nursing
Purpose: To determine the influence of mutual motivation on unintended pregnancy rates of couples who used natural family planning (NFP) methods to avoid pregnancy. STUDY DESIGN AND Methods: Using an ...
RRM Methods > General FABM > EffectivenessBody Literacy > Patient Empowerment > Informed Decision-MakingContraception/Comparison > Effectiveness > Typical Use